🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Classification Ruling

After the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the available footage. It initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the commissioner to order social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". X drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board revised the rating of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of amusement and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was made public long after the event, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the decision.

"X fought this case to defend free speech and the importance of public access about issues of public interest. We remain committed to safeguarding these principles."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator did not issue formal notices to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.