Russia Responds at the EU's Plan to Lend Immobilized Moscow's Cash to Kyiv
Ukraine is depleting its financial resources to sustain its military and economy, after close to 48 months of Russia's full-scale war.
For Europe, the remedy to filling Ukraine's funding gap of €135.7bn for the coming 24 months is found in frozen Russian assets located within Belgian bank Euroclear, and European Union officials seek to give it the green light at their EU leaders' conference next week.
Russian officials state the EU plan would be an act of theft, and the Central Bank of Russia announced on Friday it was suing Euroclear in a Moscow court even before a conclusive plan is made.
'Only Fair' to Utilize Moscow's Assets, Say Ukraine and the EU
Overall, Russia has approximately €210bn of its funds immobilized in the EU, and €185bn of that is managed by Euroclear.
European and Ukrainian authorities maintain that money should be used to restore what Russia has laid waste to: EU officials terms it a "reparations loan" and has devised a plan to prop up Ukraine's economy amounting to €90bn.
"It is appropriate that Moscow's blocked funds should be used to reconstruct what Russia has devastated – and that those funds then becomes Ukraine's," remarks Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz argues the assets will "allow Ukraine to protect itself effectively against future Russian attacks".
Moscow's lawsuit was foreseen in Brussels. But it is not just Moscow that is concerned.
Authorities in Brussels is concerned it will be left with an massive bill if it all fails, and Euroclear CEO Valérie Urbain argues using the assets could "undermine the global financial architecture".
Euroclear also has an approximate €16-17bn frozen in Russia.
The leader of Belgium Bart de Wever has set the EU a series of "logical, sensible, and warranted conditions" before he will endorse the reparations plan, and he has not excluded legal action if it "poses significant risks" for his country.
Explaining the EU's Proposal?
The EU is working to the wire before next Thursday's summit to come up with a arrangement that Belgium can accept.
Until now the EU has held off accessing the principal funds directly but since last year has transferred the "extraordinary revenues" from them to Ukraine. In 2024 that amounted to €3.7bn. From a legal standpoint, using the revenue is considered less risky as Russia is subject to sanctions and the returns are not property of the Russian state.
But global military support for Ukraine has fallen significantly in 2025, and Europe has had trouble trying to make up the deficit resulting from the US decision to virtually halt funding Ukraine under President Donald Trump.
There are presently two EU plans seeking to furnishing Ukraine with €90bn, to cover two-thirds of its budgetary necessities.
- One is to borrow the funds on capital markets, guaranteed by the EU budget as a collateral. This is Belgium's first choice but it requires a consensus by EU leaders and that would be problematic when Hungary and Slovakia object to funding Ukraine's military.
- That leaves loaning Ukraine cash from the Russian assets, which were at first held in securities but have now predominantly turned into cash. That capital is Euroclear property deposited at the European Central Bank.
Brussels' executive arm accepts Belgium has legitimate concerns and says it is convinced it has addressed them.
The plan is for Belgium to be safeguarded with a assurance encompassing all the €210bn of Russian assets in the EU.
If Euroclear suffer a loss of its own assets in Russia, the shortfall would be covered from assets belonging to Russia's own clearing house which are in the EU.
Should Russia targeted Belgium itself, any ruling by a Russian court would not be recognized in the EU.
As an important step, EU ambassadors are expected to agree on Friday to freeze indefinitely Russia's central bank assets held in Europe indefinitely.
Heretofore they have had to vote all together every six months to continue the freeze, which could have meant a ongoing risk to Belgium.
The EU ambassadors are set to use an extraordinary measure under Article 122 of the EU Treaties so the assets remain frozen as long as an "clear risk to the economic security of the union" continues.
Why Belgium is Not Yet Convinced
Belgium is insistent it remains a staunch ally of Ukraine, but perceives juridical dangers in the plan and is concerned about being forced to deal with the consequences if things fail.
A usually partisan political environment in this case has rallied behind Prime Minister Bart de Wever, who is under pressure from other European officials.
"The Belgian economy is not large. Belgian GDP is approximately €565bn – think about if it would need to bear a €185bn bill," says Veerle Colaert, professor of financial law at KU Leuven University.
Although the EU might be able to obtain adequate protections for the loan itself, Belgium worries about an added risk of being vulnerable to extra legal costs.
Prof Colaert also believes the requirement for Euroclear to issue credit to the EU would contravene EU banking regulations.
"Banks need to comply with stability regulations and shouldn't concentrate risk. Now the EU is instructing Euroclear to do exactly that.
"What is the purpose of these banking laws? It's because we want banks to be stable. And if things turn sour it would become the responsibility of Belgium to rescue Euroclear. That's another reason why it's so crucial for Belgium to secure water-tight assurances for Euroclear."
EU Leaders Under Pressure from All Sides
Time is of the essence, state a group of EU member states including those bordering Russia such as the Baltics, Finland and Poland. They believe the scheme involving immobilized capital is "the financially feasible and practically possible solution".
"It is a decisive moment for us," warns leading German conservative MP Norbert Röttgen. "Should we not succeed, I don't know what we'll do next. That's why we have to reach an agreement in a week's time".
Although Russia is unyielding its money should not be touched, there are additional apprehensions among EU officials that the US may want to use Russia's frozen billions for another purpose, as part of its own peace initiative.
Zelensky has indicated Ukraine is working with Europe and the US on a recovery fund, but he is also aware the US has been holding discussions with Russia about future co-operation.
An early draft of the US peace plan referred to $100bn of Russia's frozen assets being used by the US for reconstruction, with the US {taking|receiving