🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

In a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, opposition party officials lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House leader said the court had another time damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.